RotoBot AI
Upgrade
Group Stage · Group B · Vancouver
🇨🇭
Switzerland
2 - 1
Final
🇨🇦
Canada
Jun 24, 7:00 PM UTC · BC Place
Box score
Switzerland
Johan Manzambi🅰1
Rubén Vargas
Breel Embolo🅰1
Granit Xhaka🟨
Gregor Kobel🧤6
Canada
Promise David
Cyle Larin🟨
Maxime Crépeau🧤2
Nathan Saliba🅰1
Liam Millar🟨
De-vigged Match Odds (1X2)
SUI39%
DRAW32%
CAN30%
Model pick: Switzerland ML39% confidence
Total Goals 2.5
Over
+110
Under
-134
Draftkings
Both Teams To Score
Yes
53%
-125
No
47%
+105
Draw No Bet
SUI
-140
CAN
+132
The Breakdown

Switzerland arrive with group-best underlying numbers (7 goals from ~5.4 xG and only 3 conceded from ~3.2 xGA in three games) and a balanced 4-3-3, while Canada’s more volatile 4-4-2 has produced 8 goals from ~6.8 xG with just 3 conceded on ~4.1 xGA, driven by aggressive vertical transitions. Recent form is near-mirrored—both sides entered the group decider on W‑D‑D‑W‑D runs and then split their World Cup group results at 2‑1‑0 (Switzerland, 7:3 GD) versus 1‑1‑1 (Canada, 8:3 GD), with Switzerland taking top spot via a 2-1 win in Vancouver. The decisive matchup profile is clear: Switzerland’s front three of **Embolo–Okafor–Vargas** (combined ~3.5 non‑pen xG, 3 goals, 2 assists in the group, Embolo over 0.55 xG/90 off 3.2 shots/90) against Canada’s CBS pairing (Johnston plus Cornelius/Waterman, allowing under 0.9 non‑pen xG/90 but facing ~5.5 opposition shots in the box per game), and **Jonathan David** (2 goals, ~0.6 xG/90, 1.4 key passes/90) plus Promise David (1 goal in 20 minutes, ~0.45 xG) attacking Switzerland’s fullbacks in the channels. In midfield, Switzerland’s **Xhaka–Freuler–Aebischer** trio, who completed ~88% of passes and limited opponents to ~0.6 central‑zone xG per match, will be tested by Canada’s **Kone–Eustáquio** pairing, who create ~0.25 xA/90 from set‑plays and second balls and average ~7.5 combined tackles+interceptions per game; whichever pivot wins second phases and controls turnovers in the middle third likely drives the xG edge. Set‑pieces and pressing are key: Switzerland generate ~28% of their xG from corners and wide free‑kicks (Embolo and Itten both above 0.25 set‑piece xG in the cycle), while Canada’s press under Marsch forces ~10.5 opposition long balls and ~8 high turnovers per match but also leaves ~0.25 xG/game in transition chances conceded, making Swiss ball security under pressure a swing factor. Historically, Canada had the edge (3‑1 friendly win in 2002) before Switzerland’s 2‑1 group‑stage victory flipped the narrative, and statistically the match should be decided by whether Canada can convert a pressing‑heavy shot volume (targeting ~1.6 xG) without overexposing their back line to Switzerland’s more efficient finishing (group conversion ~1.3 goals per 1.0 non‑pen xG).

Forecasting and informational only — not betting advice.