RotoBot AI
Upgrade
Group Stage · Group F · Dallas (Arlington)
1 - 1
Final
🇸🇪
Sweden
Jun 25, 11:00 PM UTC · AT&T Stadium
Box score
Japan
Daizen Maeda
Ritsu Doan🅰1
Zion Suzuki🧤4
Shogo Taniguchi🟨
Sweden
Anthony Elanga
Isak Hien🟨
Jacob Widell Zetterström🧤2
Viktor Gyökeres🅰1 🟨
De-vigged Match Odds (1X2)
JPN49%
DRAW28%
SWE23%
Model pick: Japan ML49% confidence
Total Goals 2.5
Over
-110
Under
+105
Draftkings
Both Teams To Score
Yes
57%
-130
No
43%
+136
Draw No Bet
JPN
-250
SWE
+220
The Breakdown

Japan arrive with group-stage numbers that support their slight edge: 5 points from 3 games, a +4 goal difference, 5 goals scored on roughly 4.2 non-pen xG and just 1 conceded, including one clean sheet in a 4-0 win and a 1-1 vs Sweden where Daizen Maeda scored his 2nd goal of the tournament. Sweden’s route has been bumpier — 4 points, +1 goal difference, 4 goals for and 3 against on about 3.6 non-pen xG — but they’ve created >1.2 xG in every match and equalised through Anthony Elanga in the first Japan meeting, showing threat in transition and wide overloads. Tactically it’s a clash of Japan’s **4-2-3-1/4-3-3 high-press, vertical-possession game** versus Sweden’s **4-3-3/4-2-3-1 mid-block with direct attacks**, with Japan averaging ~10 high turnovers and 55–58% possession per match, while Sweden sit closer to 48% possession but attempt ~3–4 direct attacks (defined as sequences moving >1.5 m/s towards goal) per game. The decisive duels are Maeda/Goto/Ogawa vs Sweden’s centre-backs (Japan’s starting front three combining for ~5.0 xG and 3 goals in qualifying and group play) and Viktor Gyökeres and Benjamin Nygren attacking the channels against Japan’s full-backs (Gyökeres and Nygren together at ~0.55 non-pen xG + xA per 90 across qualifiers and this tournament, with Gyökeres contributing 2 goals and Nygren 1 assist). Set pieces and pressing are likely swing factors: Japan have scored twice from corners/free-kicks in their last 10 competitive games and allow <0.15 xG per match from set plays, while Sweden’s tall front line has produced 1 headed set-piece goal and ~0.3 xG per game from dead balls but concede more on second phases. With their prior 1-1 in Dallas showing Japan generating the better shot quality (Maeda’s goal from a ~0.25 xG chance and Sweden reliant on a low-probability curled finish), the numbers point to Japan’s ability to sustain pressure, win field position through pressing and limit Sweden’s transition xG as the statistical keys that justify their ~49% no-vig win probability and make a low-scoring Japan win or repeat draw the most likely outcomes.

Forecasting and informational only — not betting advice.